The Conservative Christian Case Against Trumpism

TLDR – Major Takeaways on Trump, Conservatism, Christianity, and Political Ideologies

• I grew up conservative and Christian. I know the language of “family values,” “law and order,” “small government,” and “strong defense” from the inside.
• When I look at Donald Trump and modern Republicanism through that lens, I don’t see a more faithful conservatism. I see a values contradiction.
• On Christian ethics, Trumpism rewards cruelty, dishonesty, and domination. It punishes truth-telling Christians and uses churches as props.
• On family values, Trump-era and GOP policies weaken real families: more trauma, more instability, more health risk, more stress.
• On meritocracy, they make it harder — not easier — for hard work to pay off, especially for children. Trauma and poverty are not a meritocracy.
• On crime and safety, the evidence favors housing, treatment, and smart justice. Trump-style “tough on crime” strategies are expensive and less effective.
• On fiscal responsibility, prevention and care cost less than punishment and cages. Trumpism chooses the most wasteful route and calls it “tough.”
• On limited government, it puts the state deep inside families’ bodies, bedrooms, and nurseries while paying lip-service to “freedom.”
• On economic strength and national security, it undermines the very foundations conservatives say they care about: rule of law, alliances, stability, and trust.
• If you genuinely love conservative Christian values, then your best move is to break with Trumpism and demand better, even if that means voting more “progressively” than you ever have before.
• I’m not asking you to stop being conservative. I’m asking you to lean harder into your values — and see where they actually lead.

---

---

What Conservative Christians Value

Let me start with this: I understand why Trump felt like an answer. He was something bold and different in a political climate of corruption, sleaze, and exploitation.

I grew up in a conservative, Mormon household. Sundays were for church. Dinnertime meant talk about faith, work, responsibility, school, and what was going on in our lives. We were a middle-class family (my parents were teachers) but we weren’t rich by any means.

We valued fiscal responsibility, because we had to be responsible with our own money. And we appreciated limited government, so we could worship freely and openly.

If you’re a conservative Christian, your core priorities probably look something like this:

• Christian faith and moral leadership
• Strong families and stable marriages
• Hard work and meritocracy
• Low crime and safe communities
• A thriving, fair economy
• Fiscal responsibility and limited government
• Strong national security and respect for America’s institutions

Those are not bad priorities. In fact, many of them are why I now support things like stronger social safety nets and citizen-led democracy. I want efficient government, not bloated government. I want accountability, not chaos.

Trump and modern Republicanism have sold us a story:

“We are the last line of defense for Christianity, family values, law and order, and America’s greatness.”

That narrative certainly sounds urgent and important. Like I said, I understand why Trump felt like an answer.

What I want to show you, as plainly and respectfully as I can, is that this story is false.

Beneath the branding, the actual behavior and policies of Trumpism undercut the very values conservatives cherish. The problem is not that you love your faith, your family, or your country. The problem is that you’ve been handed a vehicle that is driving in the opposite direction of those goals.

In this piece, I’m going to walk through each core conservative value — Christian morality, family life, hard work, crime, fiscal responsibility, limited government, prosperity, and national security — and show how Trumpism, when measured against evidence and Christian ethics, fails its own test.

You do not have to become a leftist to see this. You only have to be honest about what your values actually demand.

---

A Look at Christianity & Moral Leadership under Trump

Christian Ethics: What They Actually Require

You know this already, but it’s worth putting in plain words.

At the heart of Christianity are simple commandments:

• Love God
• Love your neighbor
• Tell the truth
• Protect the vulnerable
• Care for children and families
• Show humility instead of arrogance
• Use power to serve, not to crush

Jesus is clear about whose side He’s on: the poor, the sick, the imprisoned, the stranger, the widow, the orphan. Christian ethics are not vague. They call out pride, deceit, cruelty, and the worship of money and power.

You can debate theology all day. But if our politics reward cruelty and lies, they are not Christian politics — no matter how many times someone says “God bless America.”

Trump’s Record Against Christian Principles

When I look at Trump’s record through a Christian lens, I see a pattern that should trouble anyone who takes the Gospel seriously.

Family separation as deterrence

Under Trump’s “zero tolerance” border policy, the federal government deliberately separated parents and children to scare others away from seeking asylum.

We know what this does to children. Medical and psychological research is blunt: forced separation causes deep trauma — depression, anxiety, sleep problems, lasting toxic stress. It raises the risk of lifelong health problems and emotional scars.

Many of those families were Christian themselves, fleeing violence and persecution. Christian leaders — from Catholic bishops to evangelical pastors — condemned the policy as immoral and anti-family.

Yet the administration defended it as a “deterrent.”

If deliberately inflicting trauma on children for political messaging is not anti-Christian, what is?

Using churches and Bibles as political props

On June 1, 2020, law enforcement cleared peaceful protesters and even clergy from outside St. John’s Episcopal Church so Trump could pose with a Bible for cameras.

The Episcopal bishop condemned it as an abuse of sacred symbols. Clergy who had been ministering to people in that space were literally pushed aside for a photo-op.

That’s not “religious liberty.” That’s government using Christ as a PR stunt — literally taking God’s name in vain.

Retaliation against Christian critics

When Christianity Today — an evangelical magazine founded by Billy Graham — published an editorial arguing that Trump should be removed from office on moral grounds, Trump lashed out. He called them “far left” and tried to delegitimize them in the eyes of his base.

No one says Trump has to like criticism. But there are constructive and destructive ways to respond to it. Trump’s response to religious leaders can be boiled down to something like this:

“If you stand up for God’s commandments and rebuke me, I will attack you.”

That has a chilling effect on religious conscience and speech. It says loyalty to Trump matters more than loyalty to the Gospel.

Personal conduct that openly flouts Christian virtues

We all sin. We don’t need to ask ourselves “Is this leader perfect?” but we should ask “Does this leader try to model repentance, truth, and humility?”

Trump’s public life has been marked by:

• Constant, documented dishonesty
• Habitual insults and demeaning language
• Open boasting about sexual misconduct
• Retaliation against critics, including within the church

Prominent Christian leaders across traditions — evangelical, Catholic, mainline — have called this out as spiritually dangerous, not just “imperfect.” They warn that excusing this behavior for political gain damages our individual and collective relationship with God.

Why This Pattern Is Fundamentally Anti-Christian

I want to be very clear here: my point is not that Trump is worse than any other sinner in God’s eyes. My point is about patterns and power.

When a political movement:

• Uses fear and trauma against children as a tactic
• Treats churches and Bibles as stage props
• Punishes Christian voices that speak moral truth
• Rewards cruel speech and celebrates vengeance

…it is not defending Christianity. It is weaponizing Christianity.

That is anti-Christian, even if it uses Christian language, hires Christian influencers, and stacks the courts with judges who talk about “religious liberty.”

If your faith matters to you, it has to matter here too.

---

Family Values & Everyday Family Life in Trumpism

“Family values” gets used a lot in Republican rhetoric. But what does a pro-family world look like in real life?

What “Pro-Family” Actually Requires

For most families, the basics are not abstract:

• Stable income so you can pay rent, buy groceries, and plan.
• Reliable healthcare so a sick kid doesn’t push you into debt or ruin your job.
• Food security so children are not going to bed hungry.
• Safe, stable housing so kids can sleep, learn, and grow.
• Freedom from discrimination so your family isn’t blocked from work, housing, or adoption because of who you are.

If those foundations are shaky, family life will be stressful and fragile — no matter how many sermons you hear about the importance of marriage.

Real “family values” policy is anything that increases stability, security, and dignity for parents and kids.

GOP Policy Patterns That Harm Families

From that angle, the Trump-era and broader GOP record looks much less pro-family.

Work requirements and cuts to healthcare and food assistance

Trump and Republican leaders pushed nationwide work requirements for Medicaid and stricter rules for SNAP (food assistance). These sound reasonable on paper: “People should work.”

But systematic reviews of work requirements show a different reality:

They mostly knock eligible working families off benefits through paperwork, red tape, and confusion. They increase churn and gaps in coverage. They do not produce strong, stable employment gains.

For real working families, the result is more uninsured parents, more missed doctor visits, more food insecurity, and more financial stress — all risk factors for worse outcomes for children.

That’s not pro-family. That’s just punishing low-income families for being poor.

Discrimination in adoption and foster care

Several Republican-led states have passed laws that let agencies refuse to place children with LGBTQ parents or other “unacceptable” families based on religious or moral objections.

Again, look past the rhetoric and consider the outcome:

• Fewer stable homes available
• More kids waiting in foster care or group homes
• More stigma for families that do step up

Adoption research shows that LGBTQ parents can provide loving, stable homes, and that discrimination reduces placements and lengthens the time children spend in care.

If your top priority is children having safe, loving families, this policy moves in the wrong direction.

Abortion bans and coercive reproductive policies

I know abortion is a painful topic. Many conservative Christians see abortion as the taking of human life. I’m not asking you to change your moral view on this (though I would invite you to reconsider it).

But if we are talking about family outcomes, the data is very clear:

• States that enacted severe abortion bans after Roe was overturned have seen higher infant mortality, especially among babies with serious medical conditions and among poor and minority families.
• Women in those states face increased risk when experiencing complex pregnancies, miscarriages, or conditions like ectopic pregnancy, because doctors fear legal consequences for necessary care.
• Families face higher financial and emotional strain when forced to carry pregnancies in dangerous circumstances without adequate support.

A policy that increases maternal and infant deaths, increases medical risk, and increases financial and emotional crises for families is not “pro-life”. It is coerced risk.

If Republicans truly wanted to reduce abortions while protecting families, they would be all-in on:

• Free contraception
• Paid parental leave
• Healthcare for mothers and babies
• Child allowances and childcare

Instead, the pattern has been: Bans first, support never.

The “Family Values” Rhetoric vs. Reality

Under Trumpism, “family values” talk sells policies that actually increase…

• Stress
• Instability
• Trauma
• Health risk
• Economic insecurity

…for real families sitting at kitchen tables across this country.

If we measure by outcomes, Trump-era Republicanism is not pro-family. It is pro-control over families while stripping away the supports those families need to thrive.

---

Does Hard Work Pay Off Under Trump?

Conservatives often say: “If you work hard and play by the rules, you should be able to build a decent life.”

I agree with that. But what does it take to make that promise real?

The Conservative Ideal

The ideal is simple:

• People who hustle, learn, and show up should be rewarded.
• Laziness should not pay better than effort.
• Kids from humble backgrounds should have a fair shot at moving up.

That’s the core of the American Dream. It’s also close to Biblical ideas about work, stewardship, and responsibility.

What Actually Supports Meritocracy

Here’s what the evidence says helps hard work pay off:

• Good schools and training so effort builds real skills.
• Stable health coverage so one illness doesn’t wreck a family.
• Fair wages so full-time work clears a basic standard of living.
• Low childhood trauma so kids can focus, learn, and grow without constant fear.
• Predictable rules so people aren’t tripped by arbitrary bureaucracy.
• Equitable programs that offset systemic barriers so hard work pays off.

In other words, you need stable conditions so effort can compound over time.

If you’re a child dealing with homelessness, hunger, parental incarceration, or untreated trauma, you are not starting from a fair line. You are trying to run a race with a heavy pack on your back.

How Trump-Era GOP Policy Undercuts Meritocracy

The irony is that Trumpist policies often add weight to that pack.

Family separation and aggressive deportation

We talked about the separation of families morally. Now think about it as a meritocracy issue.

When a child’s parent is deported or detained, that child often experiences:

• Sudden loss of income
• Housing instability or foster care
• Serious emotional distress

That child did not break any rule. They did nothing wrong. Yet their chances of finishing school, building a career, and earning a good income drop.

Policies that separate families and sow fear in immigrant communities do not reward merit. They punish children for their parents’ immigration status.

Overreliance on incarceration

Mass incarceration is not just about people who committed crimes. It’s also about their children.

Kids of incarcerated parents:

• Are more likely to experience homelessness
• Face higher risks of anxiety, depression, and behavioral problems
• Struggle more in school and earn less as adults

Again, that’s not meritocracy. That’s punishing children for the crimes of their parents.

Trump-style “law and order” politics, which center harsher sentences and proud talk about “locking them up,” keep this machine running. And it hits poor and minority communities hardest, whether they’re conservative or not.

Resistance to criminal-justice reforms

More and more evidence supports reforms like:

• Shorter sentences for nonviolent offenses
• Drug treatment instead of prison
• Restorative justice programs
• Reentry support that helps people work and parent again

These changes can reduce recidivism and help people rebuild lives, which helps their kids and communities.

Yet modern Republican politics often fight these reforms under the banner of “toughness,” even when they save money and produce better outcomes.

The death of DEI destroys meritocracy — yes, even for white men

A lot of conservative Christians hear “DEI” or “affirmative action” (AA) and assume it’s anti-merit. But the best research says the opposite: the DEI tools that actually work are the ones that force accountability — plans, committees, and roles that make managers explain and track hiring and promotion decisions. That doesn’t lower standards. It reduces favoritism.

And here’s the part people miss: even under DEI and AA, white men still benefit most overall. Major reviews find AA shifts some jobs/admissions away from white men toward women and minorities, but the changes are typically modest, meaning white men still hold most high-status slots and capture much of the upside.

So when Trump and the GOP dismantle these guardrails — like Trump’s 2025 order to terminate federal DEI offices and “equity” initiatives — they don’t create “pure merit.” They create more room for legacy, referrals, and “culture fit” to dictate who wins.

That makes hard work pay off less for ordinary families — including conservative Christians without elite connections.

The Result: A Rigged “Meritocracy”

When you add it up, Trumpism doesn’t create a fair field where hard work wins. It:

• Increases childhood trauma
• Deepens racial and class divides
• Keeps families unstable
• Prioritizes punishment over opportunity
• Rewards nepotism over hard work

The people most affected are the people conservatives claim to care most about: children and hard-working families.

If we truly want hard work to pay off, we need policies that reduce trauma and give everyone an equitable starting point. Trumpism does the opposite.

---

Is the GOP Really Addressing Crime, Safety, and “Law and Order”?

You want your family to walk down the street without fear. You want your church doors open and your kids safe at school.

I want that too.

The question is: What actually works to reduce crime?

What Actually Reduces Crime

Over the last few decades, a lot of research has looked at this. Certain strategies keep showing up as effective:

• Health coverage and treatment for mental health and addiction
• Stable housing for people who would otherwise be on the street
• Restorative justice programs that reduce reoffending
• Smart policing that focuses on certainty of being caught, not raw severity

For example:

• “Housing First” programs for people with severe addiction and homelessness have reduced jail stays and emergency-room visits while saving taxpayer money.
• Medicaid expansions and more addiction treatment are linked to lower crime and fewer drug arrests in affected areas.
• Restorative justice programs — in which offenders meet victims, take responsibility, and make amends — have cut reoffending rates in multiple randomized trials and delivered benefits worth many times their cost.

None of this is “soft.” It is strategic. It focuses on breaking cycles rather than simply inflicting pain.

The Punitive “Tough on Crime” Approach of Modern GOP

Trump-era and broader GOP rhetoric leans hard on a different model:

• Longer sentences
• More incarceration
• Harsher conditions
• Emphasis on spectacle (public raids, tough talk)

These policies feel tough. But authoritative reviews — like those from major research councils — say that increasing sentence length yields small or uncertain changes in crime, while costing taxpayers a fortune.

The key deterrent is not how long the sentence is. It’s whether people think they’ll be caught at all.

So when Trump calls himself the “law and order” candidate but focuses on severity and symbolism rather than evidence-based strategies, he’s selling an illusion. It’s security theater.

Why Trump-Style “Law and Order” Fails Conservative Goals

From a conservative perspective, this is a double failure:

1. It’s less effective. It does not produce the safest communities per dollar spent.
2. It’s more expensive. It burns through billions on prisons, jails, and enforcement when cheaper, targeted interventions work better.

If you care about…

• Fewer victims
• Safer streets
• Strong families
• Responsible budgets

…then you should want crime policy that is smart, not just loud.

Trumpism offers loudness, anger, and fear. But when you match it against evidence, it woefully underperforms.

---

Fiscal Responsibility & Limited Government Under Trump

The economy and deficit are often topics where a lot of conservative Christians say, “Look, I may not love every tweet, but Trump was good for the economy and the budget.”

I want to push on that, because the numbers tell a different story.

The Conservative Ideal

Fiscal responsibility, in plain terms, means:

• Don’t waste taxpayer money.
• Don’t run up huge debts for short-term political wins.
• Keep government lean and efficient.
• Spend where it actually solves problems.

I share that instinct. I think wasteful government is dangerous and can become a tool of oppression.

Trump-Era and GOP Policy Reality

Under Trump’s first time, the federal deficit increased every year — even before COVID-19.

Independent budget analysts estimate that his policies added trillions in new borrowing. Major conservative and centrist outlets have criticized:

• His massive tax cuts tilted toward the wealthy and corporations
• His tariff policies, which effectively taxed American consumers
• His lack of serious spending restraint

On top of that, Trumpist crime and immigration policies expanded some of the most expensive parts of government:

• Prisons and detention centers
• Enforcement systems for family separation and mass deportation
• Complex bureaucracies to manage work requirements and eligibility policing

Every dollar spent incarcerating someone unnecessarily, or processing endless paperwork to knock working families off programs, is a dollar you can’t spend on:

• Early childhood education
• Addiction treatment
• Supportive housing
• Infrastructure
• Debt reduction

Prevention vs. Punishment: Which Saves Money?

When you compare prevention-based policies to punishment-based ones, the pattern is clear:

• Supportive housing often saves money by reducing jail stays and hospital visits.
• Addiction treatment reduces crime and health costs more than incarceration for drug offenses.
• Restorative justice programs deliver benefits worth several times their costs.
• Expanded health coverage cuts uncompensated care and reduces costly emergencies.

Meanwhile, long prison sentences and sprawling enforcement systems are like setting money on fire. They are high cost, low return.

From a Christian perspective, that’s poor stewardship. From a conservative perspective, it’s fiscal malpractice.

The Conservative Case for Preventative Measures

If you genuinely care about debts, deficits, and efficient government, your beef should not be with policies that:

• Prevent crime
• Reduce ER trips
• Keep families stable

Your concern should be with the expensive, failing machines that Trumpism doubles down on:

• Endless incarceration
• Family separation and detention
• Bureaucratic eligibility policing that costs more than it saves

Real fiscal conservatism asks: Where does a dollar do the most good? On that question, Trumpism fails.

---

Does Trump Believe in Small Government & Personal Freedom?

Conservatives often say: “We want government out of our lives. We want freedom. We want local control.”

Me too! I believe government should be a tool of the people, not a weapon against them.

But if we look at where Trump-era and modern GOP energy has gone, it’s not toward limited government. It’s toward selective big government — especially in the most intimate corners of family life.

The Conservative Ideal

True limited government means:

• The state should not micromanage families’ private decisions.
• People should have strong protections for conscience and religious liberty.
• Power should be pushed down to local communities whenever possible.

It doesn’t mean “no government.” It means sensible government that knows its limits.

Big-Government Intrusions Under Trumpism

Here are a few ways modern Republicanism has grown the reach of the state into families’ lives:

Government deciding which families are “acceptable”

When laws let the state (or state-backed agencies) say, “This married couple can adopt, this one cannot,” because of their sexual orientation or beliefs, that’s government inside the family.

It’s not really protecting religious freedom for agencies; it’s granting state-enforced power to exclude certain families from raising children who need homes.

Government controlling reproductive decisions, even in emergencies

Abortion bans with no real exceptions for health, rape, or fetal anomalies put the state between:

• A pregnant woman and her doctor
• Parents and their most gut-wrenching medical decisions

Doctors face criminal penalties for doing what their training — and often their conscience — says is necessary. Families face the risk of death or severe harm because lawmakers want to control what happens in their uterus, even in tragic medical situations.

That is not limited government. That is overreaching government — to the point it is reaching right into the bodies of citizens.

State power separating parents and children

We’ve already talked about family separation at the border. It deserves mention here too.

When the government takes children from their parents to send a message, it is using one of the most extreme forms of state power. That is a big, coercive government, not a small one.

The Freedom Rhetoric vs. Reality

Trump-era rhetoric talks about “freedom” and “tyranny” in broad, often theatrical terms.

But for an immigrant mother whose child is taken, a woman in medical crisis turned away from care, or a loving couple told they can’t adopt, the most direct tyrant is not some abstract “global elite.” It is the state government or federal agency enforcing those rules.

Limited government would:

• Trust families with intimate decisions
• Protect pluralism and conscience
• Avoid using law enforcement as a moral hammer

Trumpism does the opposite, especially when it comes to bodies and families.

---

Does Trump Create Economic Strength & Shared Prosperity?

Many conservatives supported Trump because they believed he was good for the economy.

Stock market up. Unemployment down. Promises of bringing jobs back. It felt like a businessman had finally taken the wheel.

But the strength of an economy is not just a quarterly growth number. It’s about:

• How resilient the system is
• How well ordinary families are doing
• Whether kids have better prospects than their parents
• How stable things remain when shocks hit

What Underpins a Strong, Resilient Economy

The pillars of a healthy economy are pretty straightforward:

• A skilled, healthy workforce
• High participation — people working who can work
• Low child poverty and trauma
• Stable communities with low crime
• Trust in institutions and the rule of law

Investments like…

• Good schools and training
• Health coverage
• Food security
• Childcare
• Stable housing

…aren’t just “nice to have.” They raise productivity, reduce costs, and build the human capital every economy relies on.

How Trump/GOP Choices Weaken Long-Term Foundations

Short-term tax cuts can goose markets. But long-term strength depends on those deeper foundations.

Trump-era and modern GOP priorities:

• Cut or resisted expansions in health coverage and social supports that keep workers stable.
• Pushed work requirements and benefit cuts that increase instability for low-income workers.
• Backed policies that increase incarceration and immigration fear, fracturing communities and reducing trust.
• Undermined trust in elections and institutions, which investors and businesses actually care about.

You can’t build a strong economy on:

• Sick workers afraid to see a doctor
• Parents juggling three jobs and still unable to afford childcare
• Children growing up in constant stress and trauma
• Communities divided by fear and resentment
• Investors unsure whether contracts and elections will be honored

Short-Term Wins vs. Long-Term Strength

Trump is good at selling short-term wins: a stock-market high, a boast about GDP, a big tax cut.

But conservatives used to care deeply about the long game:

• Stable families
• Strong communities
• Sound institutions
• Incremental, sustainable growth

Those require patience, investment, and restraint. They require asking, “What will this do to the next generation?” not “What will make my stocks go up, right now?”

If we judge Trumpism by long-term economic health — not just raw vibes — it is not a conservative economic project. It is a short-term political project that trades away future resilience for immediate, shaky gains.

---

National Security & American Strength Under Donald Trump

Conservatives have long seen themselves as the adults in the room on foreign policy and defense. Strong on alliances, strong on deterrence, strong on institutions.

Trumpism has taken a wrecking ball to that image.

Conservative Concerns About Security

Real national security means:

• Protecting the homeland from external threats
• Guarding critical technologies and supply chains
• Maintaining alliances that deter aggression
• Defending democratic institutions at home
• Treating intelligence, law enforcement, and the military with respect

It’s not just about “being tough.” It’s about being reliable.

Trump-Era Departures from Security Best Practice

A few key breaks from conservative security principles stand out:

Undermining election legitimacy

Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was “stolen” did more than rally a base. They:

• Encouraged a mob attack on the Capitol
• Undermined Americans’ trust in their own democracy
• Signaled to foreign adversaries that the U.S. can be destabilized from within

Election integrity is a core national-security issue. If a nation cannot manage peaceful transfers of power and trust in its own system, it becomes vulnerable.

Attacks on intelligence and law enforcement when politically inconvenient

Trump has repeatedly attacked…

• The FBI
• The intelligence community
• Career civil servants

…whenever their findings or investigations cut against him.

Conservatives once prided themselves on respecting the rule of law and supporting law enforcement. Trumpism flips that: loyalty to Trump comes first; national-security professionals get smeared if they don’t fall in line.

Strain on alliances and erratic foreign policy

Allies rely on U.S. consistency. Trump’s habit of threatening withdrawals, cozying up to authoritarian leaders, and questioning bedrock alliances like NATO has shaken that trust.

Even conservative foreign-policy thinkers have warned that this undercuts decades of security architecture that kept the peace.

Enforcing military loyalty to one man, not the Constitution

A strong nation doesn’t fear its own military. It fears what happens when the military is pulled into personal politics.

In civil–military research, when leaders start shaping the armed forces around personal loyalty — rewarding compliance, punishing candor, and turning national security institutions into tools for domestic power — the alarm bells start ringing.

That’s how professional militaries get politicized. And it’s how democracies get weaker.

Conservatives should recognize this immediately: A government willing to treat the military as an extension of one man’s will is the opposite of limited government. It’s the seed of a national police power.

Here’s what this looks like in real-world actions and documented patterns:

• Purges signal a loyalty test. In 2025, multiple outlets reported significant removals and reassignments across national security roles — NSC staff, senior intelligence leadership, and top military/intelligence positions. Whether each removal is “legal” isn’t the only question. The bigger question is what message it sends: tell the truth at your own risk.
• Punishing dissent chills honest counsel. When high-profile figures are targeted after disagreements, it teaches everyone else to self-censor. In national security, self-censorship is how you get blind spots, strategic misreads, and preventable crises.
• Domestic militarization risks oppression — especially against states. In December 2025, a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to end its deployment of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles and return control to the state, criticizing the federalization of state troops and warning against a de facto “national police force.” If you’re conservative about federalism, this should set off alarms.

The research is clear on what politicization of our military produces:

• Worse national security decisions. When promotion and protection depend on perceived loyalty, leaders stop delivering “bad news.” Intelligence and military assessments become shaped by what a political boss wants to hear. That’s how you lose wars, mismanage crises, and get surprised by adversaries.
• A weaker, less trusted military. A professional military depends on the public trust that it serves the Constitution, not a party or person. Once citizens believe the force can be wielded domestically for political objectives, confidence erodes. Recruitment, cohesion, and legitimacy take hits.
• A more coercive federal government. Conservatism — at least the real kind — protects states’ rights, civil liberties, and local governance from federal overreach. Using troops in domestic contexts over state objections pushes in the opposite direction. It normalizes a federal muscle that can be turned on citizens and states when convenient.

Conservative thought leaders agree. Politicizing the armed forces is a self-inflicted wound. Even from a purely strategic standpoint, it trades long-term readiness and institutional credibility for short-term political control.

If you care about American strength, the goal isn’t a military that’s “loyal” to a politician. The goal is a military that’s loyal to the Constitution, disciplined by law, and restrained from becoming a domestic instrument of intimidation.

That’s what keeps us safe from enemies abroad — and from tyranny at home.

Why This Matters for Conservatives

If you care about…

• Deterring adversaries
• Protecting U.S. interests abroad
• Keeping the homeland stable

…then you need predictability, integrity, and institutional strength.

Trumpism offers none of those. It offers:

• Personal loyalty over national interest
• Conspiracy over intelligence
• Chaos over consistency

That’s not conservative-minded national security. It’s a security risk.

---

The Conservative Values Contradiction Under Trumpism

Let’s put everything we’ve talked about side by side.

Conservative Christians value:

• Christianity
• Family values
• Meritocracy
• Law and order
• Fiscal restraint
• Limited government
• National strength

Now compare those to Trumpist reality:

Christianity vs. cruelty and dishonesty

• Jesus teaches humility, truth, care for the stranger, and protection of children.
• Trumpism celebrates cruelty as “owning the libs,” excuses chronic lying, and uses churches as backdrops while attacking Christian publications that speak moral truth.

Family values vs. family-breaking policy

• Real family values require stability and safety.
• Trumpism champions policies that traumatize children (family separation), strip supports from low-income families, and increase health and financial risks for parents.

Meritocracy vs. locked-in disadvantage

• Meritocracy needs kids who are healthy and secure enough to learn and work, as well as equitable programs to ensure hard work pays off regardless of systemic barriers.
• Trumpist policies deepen trauma, create instability, and dismantle programs that foster meritocracy — making it increasingly difficult, if not impossible, for hard work to pay off.

Law and order vs. high-cost, low-return punishment

• Effective public safety comes from prevention, smart enforcement, and accountability.
• Trumpism leans on performative toughness and longer sentences that cost more but don’t deliver commensurate safety.

Fiscal restraint vs. wasteful, punitive systems

• A responsible budget prioritizes high-return investments and trims expensive failures.
• Trump-era priorities balloon deficits and pour money into cages and bureaucracy while cutting proven, cost-saving supports.

Limited government vs. coercive intrusion

• Limited government respects family privacy and conscience.
• Trumpism increases state power to control reproductive decisions, define “acceptable” families, and tear children from parents.

National strength vs. weakened institutions and alliances

• Strong nations protect their democratic systems and alliances.
• Trumpism undermines trust in elections, attacks national-security professionals, shifts military loyalty away from the Constitution, and erodes confidence among allies.

This is not a more “authentic” conservatism. It is a betrayal of conservative values, wrapped in conservative branding.

---

The New Conservative Christian Movement

Conservatism has always claimed to be about stewardship. Of families. Of moral authority. Of social trust. Of public resources. Of institutions that must endure longer than any one leader or election cycle.

But stewardship requires honesty about outcomes.

When slogans diverge from results, conservatism loses its meaning. What remains is branding without substance or accountability. Thankfully, a growing number of voters who still hold conservative values are beginning to notice that gap.

What is emerging is not a rejection of conservatism, but a recalibration of it.

Reframing conservatism around outcomes, not political party

Strip away party labels and culture-war aesthetics, and conservative priorities are straightforward:

• Protect families
• Reward work
• Reduce crime
• Steward resources
• Preserve moral credibility

These are not abstract ideals. They are measurable outcomes.

• A government that stabilizes families is more conservative than one that breaks them apart.
• A policy that reduces crime at lower cost is more conservative than one that merely sounds tough.
• A system that prevents harm before it happens is more conservative than one that spends endlessly on unnecessary punishment after the fact.

The question is no longer which party claims conservatism — but which policies actually deliver it.

Why Democrats and Progressives Align More with Conservative Christian Values Today

Across decades of empirical research, a consistent pattern emerges: policies that reduce child poverty, economic precarity, and family stress are the same policies that strengthen social order, improve long-term mobility, and lower crime.

These outcomes closely mirror Christian moral priorities:

• Care for the poor
• Protection of children
• Healing the sick
• Welcoming the stranger
• Truthfulness in public life

Modern Democratic and progressive platforms increasingly emphasize policies that operationalize these values: income supports that keep families afloat, healthcare access that prevents medical bankruptcy, food and housing stability that reduce trauma, and respect for democratic norms that preserve trust and peace.

Just as important is a renewed emphasis on institutional integrity — truthful governance, lawful transfers of power, and nonviolent political processes. These are not procedural niceties. They are moral commitments that underpin family stability, economic confidence, and national cohesion.

Christian ethics are not served by chaos, dishonesty, or cruelty. They are served by policies that measurably reduce suffering and strengthen the social fabric.

Results-Based Morality

Christian ethics are not concerned with partisan branding. They are concerned with fruit.

If a policy reduces harm, strengthens families, lowers crime, and saves taxpayer money, it aligns with conservative Christian morality — regardless of which party advances it.

Conversely, policies that increase trauma, destabilize households, erode truth, or waste public resources fail that moral test, even when wrapped in religious language or conservative symbolism.

Results-based morality rejects symbolic politics. It demands evidence. It asks whether a policy and party actually does what it claims.

The modern Democratic Party is Center-Right

Despite caricatures to the contrary, the modern Democratic Party operates largely within a center-right economic framework.

It accepts markets, private enterprise, and capitalism — while insisting on guardrails to correct market failures that harm families, workers, and communities. It emphasizes work incentives, family tax credits, national security alliances, and incremental reform over revolutionary change.

In many respects, the Democratic platform reflects substantial continuity with Reagan-era Republican priorities: economic stability, growth through investment, institutional strength, and sustained global leadership.

What has shifted is not Democratic ideology so much as Republican positioning. As the GOP has moved toward populist grievance and identity politics, Democrats have increasingly occupied the space of pragmatic governance, evidence-based reform, and institutional preservation.

What Conservatives May Have Missed

Several hard truths follow from this realignment.

Government can be limited and effective. Compassion and accountability are not opposites. Preventing harm is cheaper, more moral, and more conservative than punishing it after the fact.

Programs that stabilize families reduce downstream costs in policing, healthcare, incarceration, and emergency response. Policies that keep people healthy, housed, and employed conserve public resources better than systems built on perpetual crisis management.

This is not big government ideology. It is cost-conscious stewardship.

Today’s Real Conservative Movement

The real conservative movement today prioritizes outcomes over branding, stewardship over spectacle, and moral credibility over performative outrage.

Measured by family stability, fiscal responsibility, crime reduction, institutional integrity, and Christian ethics, that movement no longer lives in the GOP. It lives in the Democratic Party.

---

If You Love Conservative Christian Values, Break From Trumpism

I’m not asking you to stop being Christian. I’m not asking you to move to the Left.

I’m asking you to notice that Trumpism and modern Republicanism, as they currently operate, do not live up to your values:

• Christian ethics
• Strong, stable families
• Fair reward for hard work
• Real public safety
• Honest stewardship of tax dollars
• Limited government in family life
• National security and institutional strength

When measured against these, Trump and the current GOP come up short.

You deserve better than a movement that uses your faith as a shield while attacking the very things you love.

What to Do Next

I can’t force you to change your mind. But if something in this resonates, here are concrete ways to act on it:

1. Get curious, not defensive.
   • Read Christian critiques of Trump from leaders you respect — across denominations.
   • Ask: “If I applied the same moral standards to my political heroes that I apply to my moral enemies, what would I see?”
2. Break the information bubble.
   • Seek out conservative and centrist writers who have raised alarms about Trump’s impact on conservatism and the rule of law.
   • Listen to veterans of the movement who left because they felt their values were being betrayed.
3. Vote your values, not your tribe.
   • You don’t have to join a specific party or adopt my entire worldview.
   • You can still be a conservative Christian who decides, in this moment, that Trumpism is a bridge too far.
   • Voting for more progressive candidates on key issues can be an act of faithfulness to your values, not a betrayal of them.
4. Get politically active in healthier directions.
   • Call your legislators and tell them you want policies that actually strengthen families: healthcare, childcare, housing, and justice reform.
   • Support local candidates — Republican, Democrat, or independent — who model integrity and care for the vulnerable.
   • Run for office yourself on a platform that truly honors Christian ethics and conservative principles.
5. Have the hard conversations.
   • Share this article with friends or family you trust.
   • Ask, “Can we talk about this? Just to better understand each other?”
   • The goal is not to “win” but to, together, build a better path forward for everyone.

A Simple If–Then Plan

To make this practical, here’s a concrete plan you can choose to follow:

• If you find yourself saying, “I don’t like Trump’s behavior, but I like his policies,”
  then take 20 minutes this week to pick one of the values above (family, honesty, limited government, fiscal responsibility) and look up how his actual policies affect that value in real life — beyond the headlines and talking points.
• If you feel a twinge of doubt or discomfort about your current political alignment,
  then commit to having one honest conversation this month with a fellow believer about those doubts, without trying to resolve them in an hour.
• If you are heading into the next election still unsure,
  then decide in advance: “I will vote first for candidates who protect families, tell the truth, respect the rule of law, and reduce harm — even if that means crossing party lines.”

These are the steps people take when they’re serious about their values, not just their team.

You don’t have to agree with me on everything. But if you care about Christianity, family, hard work, safety, and a government that truly serves the people, I’m asking you — as a fellow child of God — to look at Trumpism with clear eyes.

And then choose leaders and policies that actually live out the values you’ve always held dear.